Update on In re Flores

Just to refresh your memory, we posted this news when it happen (9/10/12).  Since then the tee has petitioned for an en banc rehearing.  We are still waiting to hear from the 9th re: the en banc rehearing.  I will let you know the result of the petition for re-hearing once we receive it.  I do not believe they petitioned for a stay pending consideration of the rehearing.  Therefore, it is binding on our bk judges (please feel free to correct me if I am wrong).

Thank you,  Nancy B. Clark

Editors Note:  Flores is the 9th Circuit Case that said a 5 year plan is not required of an above-median debtor who has no disposable income per the means test.

Trackbacks for this post

  1. Update on In re Flores | Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Los Angeles California

Leave a Reply


8 − = five